Issue: Incorrect context being fetched in Docker environment despite correct namespace

Hi everyone,

I’m facing a strange issue with my Pinecone integration. The app works perfectly when run locally — it fetches the correct context from the specified namespace. However, when I run the exact same setup inside a Docker container, the context being fetched appears to come from a completely unrelated document that doesn’t exist in my namespace.

To debug this, I logged the namespace value before and after fetching the context in both environments. In all cases, the namespace is exactly as expected and matches what I’ve set. Still, the result differs: locally it’s correct, but in Docker it pulls in irrelevant context.

I’ve verified that the Docker container has access to the correct environment variables and Pinecone API key. I’m not sure if it’s a caching issue, stale index, or some networking/permissions quirk with Docker.

Has anyone encountered something similar or have ideas on what could be causing this discrepancy?

Thanks in advance for any insights.

Update: Pinecone fetching context from incorrect namespace (even locally now)

Hi everyone,

I’m facing a critical issue with Pinecone where it’s fetching context from the wrong namespace.

Initially, everything worked as expected when running locally — the correct context was retrieved from the specified namespace. However, in Docker, it started pulling in context from documents not present in the target namespace. I verified that the namespace being passed was correct before and after the call.

Now, surprisingly, even the local setup is showing the same issue — it’s fetching context from an entirely different namespace than what I’m specifying. I’ve double-checked that:

  • The namespace is correct and consistent in logs.
  • The correct API key and environment are being used.
  • The documents being retrieved do not exist in the intended namespace.

This behavior is completely breaking retrieval logic. It almost feels like the namespace parameter is being ignored or overridden internally.

Has anyone experienced something similar or can suggest where to look? Could it be a Pinecone-side issue like stale routing or a bug?

Hi @tushar.ekad - Thanks for posting on the Community forums!

Can you share more about how your app is retrieving data from the namespace? Code snippets, 3rd party libraries, which SDK you’re using will be helpful.

Have you looked at how docker caches the container/container builds?

Hi @jenna, thanks for the quick response!

Here are the details you asked for:

Context

I’m using the langchain_pinecone.vectorstores.PineconeVectorStore with LangChain + Bedrock embeddings. The retrieval logic works fine most of the time, but now it’s returning documents from wrong namespaces, both locally and in Docker.

I’ve confirmed:

  • The correct namespace is being passed (print() before and after creation).
  • The index is correct.
  • Docker image was rebuilt without cache using --no-cache.
  • Pinecone API keys, env, and access config are correctly set in both local and Docker environments.

Following is the code I am using:
from langchain_pinecone.vectorstores import PineconeVectorStore
from langchain_aws import ChatBedrock, BedrockEmbeddings
from pinecone import Pinecone
import os
import boto3

PINECONE_API_KEY = “<REDACTED_API_KEY>”
INDEX_NAME = “”
NAMESPACE = “”

os.environ[“PINECONE_API_KEY”] = PINECONE_API_KEY

client = boto3.client(
service_name=“bedrock-runtime”,
aws_access_key_id=“”,
aws_secret_access_key=“”,
region_name=“us-east-1”
)

embedding = BedrockEmbeddings(client=client, model_id=‘amazon.titan-embed-text-v2:0’)
pc = Pinecone(api_key=PINECONE_API_KEY)
index = pc.Index(INDEX_NAME)

def create_retriever(INDEX_NAME, NAMESPACE):
print(“[create_retriever] Using namespace:”, NAMESPACE)
vectorstore = PineconeVectorStore(
index_name=INDEX_NAME,
embedding=embedding,
namespace=NAMESPACE
)
retriever = vectorstore.as_retriever(search_kwargs={“k”: 5})
return retriever, vectorstore

def inspect_index(index_name, namespace):
index = pc.Index(index_name)
stats = index.describe_index_stats()
print(“\nIndex stats:”)
print(“Available namespaces:”, list(stats[“namespaces”].keys()))
if namespace in stats[“namespaces”]:
print(f"Vector count in ‘{namespace}’:“, stats[“namespaces”][namespace][“vector_count”])
else:
print(f"Namespace ‘{namespace}’ not found.”)

def test_retriever_flow():
retriever, vectorstore = create_retriever(INDEX_NAME, NAMESPACE)
print(“Namespace in retriever:”, vectorstore._namespace)
inspect_index(INDEX_NAME, NAMESPACE)
query = “Why is this product a good choice for users?”
print(“\nFetching documents for query:”, query)
docs = retriever.invoke(query)
print(“\n Retrieved documents:”, docs)

if name == “main”:
test_retriever_flow()

Questions

  1. Could Pinecone be serving cached or stale results across namespaces?
  2. Is there any known issue with PineconeVectorStore or LangChain’s integration that may ignore or override the namespace?
  3. Could this be related to an eventual consistency delay or misrouting internally?

Issue 2: Index Has Vectors, But Retrieval Returns No Documents

Following up on my previous post regarding namespace mismatch — I’ve also noticed another issue. The retriever now correctly points to the expected namespace ("HMP Data"), and describe_index_stats() confirms that there are 332 vectors in it.
Note: This behavior noticed When I ran code outside the application… with python file

Problem:

Even though the namespace has vectors, running a query like "what is pbm" returns no documents.

Fetching documents for query: what is pbm
Retrieved documents: []
No documents found.

Debugging So Far:

  • Namespace and index name are correct (confirmed via logs & pinecone UI).
  • Retrieval is done using LangChain’s PineconeVectorStore.as_retriever(k=5).
  • No filters are applied.
  • Embeddings are created using amazon.titan-embed-text-v2:0 via BedrockEmbeddings.
  • describe_index_stats() shows 332 vectors under "HMP Data".
  • Tried different phrasings of queries & with different queries as well — no luck.
  • Embedding dimension and index dimension is 1024.

Update

After facing inconsistent results with PineconeVectorStore.as_retriever(), I decided to test querying Pinecone directly using the low-level index.query() method — and it worked exactly as expected.

Here’s the code snippet I used:

from pinecone import Pinecone
from langchain_aws import BedrockEmbeddings

embedding = BedrockEmbeddings(client=client, model_id='amazon.titan-embed-text-v2:0')
query_vector = embedding.embed_query(query)

pc = Pinecone(api_key="<REDACTED_API_KEY>", region="us-east-1")
index = pc.Index("<index_name>")

response = index.query(
    vector=query_vector,
    top_k=5,
    namespace="<namespace-name>",
    include_metadata=True
)

This correctly returned results only from the specified namespace.


Questions on PineconeVectorStore.as_retriever()

  1. Could there be a bug or unexpected behavior in how PineconeVectorStore.as_retriever() handles namespaces internally?
  2. Is there any known issue where LangChain’s Pinecone integration overrides or ignores the namespace argument?
  3. Does the retriever implementation cache or share state across instances in a way that could cause cross-namespace leakage?
  4. Would you recommend sticking to index.query() directly for better control?

Hey @tushar.ekad -

Thanks for sharing so much information and testing this directly against the Pinecone SDK. Very helpful in narrowing it down.

I am asking around to see if there are any known issues on the LangChain side, however when I tried out the as_retriever().invoke(query) approach within a notebook, I didn’t experience any issues. I would suggest making sure you’re using the latest of the libraries as I know some of the LangChain Pinecone library has recently changed. You can check that your app is using the packages from the correct location with this code:

import sys
print(sys.path)

As for whether or not to use the Pinecone SDK directly, that depends on a few things, including your use case and whether or not you need the additional features of LangChain. The Pinecone SDK will always be the latest and greatest and will be the easiest for us to provide support for. We don’t directly control the other libraries like LangChain but offer support to them when needed.